Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C855-18U (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '20 at 15:21
Run Duration	107 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 87.8 1-Core 76 2-Core 145 63% 103 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 201 27% 200 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.65% Terrible	Lighting 4.03 Reflection 5.38 Parallax 2.78 3% 4.07 fps	MRender 5.05 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 7.7 4% 5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.65% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: JE3OA60B SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 52 40 43 48 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 86.5 Write 84.5 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 49.1 48% 65.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1600, 1777 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.5% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 17.3 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 15.7 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM