Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '17 at 21:13
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 93.8
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 136
63% 100 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 441
42% 346 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Zotac(19DA 2376) 2GB
CLim: 1569 MHz, MLim: 1755 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32% Below average
Lighting 40.7
Reflection 36.3
Parallax 32.7
33% 36.5 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 35
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB S1S3 120GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 296
Write 145
Mixed 194
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 2.53
46% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 98.8
DQ Mixed 14.7
38% 81.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 9.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 907 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback