bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Motherboard X99-D3
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '20 at 22:09
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 173
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 664
60% 505 Pts
64-Core 1,340
83% 1,340 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.7.1
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.4% Average
Lighting 57.6
Reflection 65.4
Parallax 73.6
47% 65.5 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 58.4
Splatting 54.2
48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500SD-01KCC0 250GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2D08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 37 37 37 43 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 46.4
Write 50.2
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 35.6
30% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 33%
WD WD3001FYYG-01SL3 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: VR02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 166 167 167 167 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 167
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 167
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 94%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB
195GB free, PID 61b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 41 42 41 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 41.1
Write 39.8
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 41.4
53% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.8% Above average
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 13.1
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback