Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateAug 16 '20 at 07:55
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 66%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 123
54% 87.7 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 258
30% 235 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Lighting 90
Reflection 77.2
Parallax 64.5
73% 77.3 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 85.1
Splatting 83
66% 79.6 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 253 232 243 250 231 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 1,031
Write 668
Mixed 398
SusWrite 282
132% 595 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 34.3
120% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 234
176% 235 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 106%
Great: 236%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
206GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 53 53 54 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 70
Write 62
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 53.1
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 51%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
201GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 88 88 88 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 105
Write 99.5
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 89.2
73% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
119GB free
Firmware: CC4D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 121 129 118 121 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 108
Write 60.5
Mixed 77
SusWrite 123
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 1600 CL9 Series F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 1600 CL9 Series 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 12.4
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 10.9
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback