Asrock X99 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory122 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191025
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateAug 18 '20 at 14:22
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 205
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 780
70% 588 Pts
64-Core 2,796
173% 2,796 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$150
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 113
Parallax 218
95% 149 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 126
Splatting 159
111% 132 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57DA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 859 906 885 897 891 835 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,264
Write 1011
Mixed 820
SusWrite 879
223% 994 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 39.5
158% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 754
DQ Write 546
DQ Mixed 599
461% 633 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 181%
Great: 207%
Pc300 NVMe SK hynix 256GB
74GB free
Firmware: 20003A00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 399 396 400 399 396 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 933
Write 387
Mixed 515
SusWrite 398
124% 558 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 37.2
146% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 703
DQ Write 402
DQ Mixed 496
384% 534 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 131%
Great: 142%
UCSC-F-H16003 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: KNCCP100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1001 992 989 985 984 983 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 659
Write 945
Mixed 762
SusWrite 989
190% 839 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 57.4
189% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 680
DQ Mixed 748
560% 748 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 179%
Great: 179%
UCSC-F-H16003 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: KNCCP100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 948 952 949 949 949 952 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 657
Write 949
Mixed 751
SusWrite 950
188% 827 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 57.7
190% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 839
DQ Write 681
DQ Mixed 753
566% 758 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 177%
Great: 179%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 59.6
MC Write 52.5
MC Mixed 49.2
154% 53.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 131%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Taichi Builds (Compare 427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback