Performance Results


Gaming 116% UFO	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 190% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	199% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 324 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 63.7 1-Core 49 2-Core 141 48% 84.5 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 760 58% 516 Pts	64-Core 3,106 192% 3,106 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,104 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% MSI(1462 3882) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.14 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	199% Outstanding	Lighting 280 Reflection 295 Parallax 338 228% 304 fps	MRender 365 Gravity 262 Splatting 190 213% 272 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 199% Great: 230%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
UCSC-F-H16003 1.5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 163% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: KNCCD111 SusWrite @10s intervals: 860 821 824 825 821 820 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	136% Outstanding	Read 632 Write 825 Mixed 695 SusWrite 829 169% 745 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 39.6 128% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 565 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 403 313% 435 MB/s
Poor: 136% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 179%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A4K40BB2-CTD M393A4K40CB2-CTD M393A4K40CB2-CTD M393A4K40CB2-CTD M393A4K40CB2-CTD M393A4K40BB2-CTD M393A4K40BB2-CTD M393A4K40CB2-CTD 255GB 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	117% Outstanding	MC Read 54.9 MC Write 43.3 MC Mixed 46.3 138% 48.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 14.2 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

SSD
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples	49x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	45x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	39x

RAM
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	234x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	139x
Atermiter 2x16GBUnknownBench 65%, 839 samples	90x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $130