Asus F1A75-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '17 at 21:03
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 47
2-Core 83.7
45% 68.7 Pts
4-Core 75.6
8-Core 142
13% 109 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 4.77
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 4.66
4% 5.08 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 5.17
4% 4.44 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 462
Write 186
Mixed 271
67% 307 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 4.52
54% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 7.72
36% 81 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 72%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
58GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 73.1
Write 71.2
Mixed 63.6
52% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.36
100% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBNQ Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 F3-12800CL9-2GBNQ Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.9% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.8
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-V PRO Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V PRO - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $213
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback