Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-bw0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Laptop 15-bw0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8330
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171117
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 23 '20 at 04:41
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 44.6
2-Core 80
39% 61.6 Pts
4-Core 77.5
8-Core 79.2
10% 78.3 Pts
64-Core 87.5
5% 87.5 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 8330) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 7.69
Parallax 5.53
3% 5.73 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 4.91
4% 4.09 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
825GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RSM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 80 99 97 83 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 92.1
Write 100
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 85.6
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.2
103% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 12GB
1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.9% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-bw0xx Builds (Compare 712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-bw0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback