Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 23 '20 at 10:24
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 210
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 610
62% 502 Pts
64-Core 736
46% 736 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.1% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 141
Parallax 134
98% 132 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 128
Splatting 105
93% 115 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 244 240 243 242 246 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 444
Write 416
Mixed 287
SusWrite 240
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 36.2
123% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 394
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 243
209% 310 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86%
Great: 108%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
717GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 234 234 238 235 239 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 455
Mixed 457
SusWrite 231
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 47.2
149% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 355
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 133%
Corsair Force GT 240GB-$499
221GB free
Firmware: 5.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 199 196 200 197 199 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.6% Good
Read 244
Write 229
Mixed 214
SusWrite 195
50% 220 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 29.3
102% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 141
118% 171 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 92%
Corsair Force GT 240GB-$499
222GB free
Firmware: 5.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 197 195 198 196 198 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.8% Good
Read 232
Write 230
Mixed 199
SusWrite 193
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 30.1
104% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 144
121% 174 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 92%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 125 113 112 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
66% Good
Read 118
Write 88.6
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 112
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66%
Great: 87%
ROG ESD-S1C 1TB
644GB free, PID 1932
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 309 314 314 312 315 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 280
Write 302
Mixed 285
SusWrite 304
405% 293 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 21.1
1,594% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.1
DQ Write 29.6
DQ Mixed 27.6
2,039% 27.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 184%
Great: 197%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-067.A00LF 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.9% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 28.5
88% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,069
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback