Today's hottest deals

MSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160715
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 26 '20 at 10:54
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 98
2-Core 198
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 574
59% 477 Pts
64-Core 776
48% 776 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 140
Parallax 123
109% 132 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 129
Splatting 102
93% 115 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 961 682 679 664 667 662 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 2,165
Write 1,979
Mixed 1,400
SusWrite 719
350% 1,566 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 70
225% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 722
DQ Write 403
DQ Mixed 589
431% 571 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 226%
Great: 340%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
677GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 78 78 77 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 94
Write 96.3
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 76.7
55% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
413GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 79 80 80 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 82.1
Write 77.8
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 78.9
60% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 67%
JetFlash Transcend 2GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.8 7.1 7 7.1 7.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.68% Terrible
Read 24.3
Write 5.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 6.9
11% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.68%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$35
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.8% Good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 19.9
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 1,079 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback