Asus A88X-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	9.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus A88X-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160310
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '17 at 03:05
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 9,821 User benchmarks, average bench 46% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Memory 78.6 1-Core 74 2-Core 136 58% 96.1 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 221 27% 208 Pts	64-Core 218 14% 218 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 25,284 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.2.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	9.87% Terrible	Lighting 12.7 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 17.3 10% 13.9 fps	MRender 9.19 Gravity 10.5 Splatting 12.2 9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 9.87% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 8240778 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 96782793059369 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1223 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 75 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 38 55837065247 (C2) HDA temperature 31 38 55837065247 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 8240778 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 8240778 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 8240778 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 5344 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4005 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4005 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6403	32.7% Below average	Read 172 Write 53.7 Mixed 76.8 22% 101 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 54.3 4K Mixed 10 70% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 58.7 DQ Write 52 DQ Mixed 19.4 24% 43.4 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 69%
Seagate Constellation CS 1TB 852 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 763GB free Firmware: CN03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 83 63 211721240 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1158 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 98816359 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 10686 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1132 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 21 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 58 572063777 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 45 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1147 (C2) HDA temperature 33 42 51539607585 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	97.5% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 171 Mixed 165 127% 168 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.24 101% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 113%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 329GB free Firmware: 1AJ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 168 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 83 82 5420 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3427 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 24944 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2532 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 4 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 58 180389478431 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 59 59 22061 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 561 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3442	74% Very good	Read 126 Write 132 Mixed 100 89% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.98 4K Mixed 0.5 135% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-17000CL11-4GBSR 8GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	40.3% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 16.5 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 11.7 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88X-PLUS Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88X-PLUS - $114

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	24x
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	18x
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples	17x

GPU
Radeon HD 8670DAMDBench 5%, 5,822 samples	12x
R9 270AMD $140Bench 24%, 47,409 samples	9x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	8x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	6x
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 8GBUnknownBench 34%, 241 samples	4x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $287

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16