Gigabyte GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350N-Gaming WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateAug 27 '20 at 12:45
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 77
1-Core 110
2-Core 215
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 634
67% 537 Pts
64-Core 819
51% 819 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$267
Gigabyte(1458 37D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.4% Very good
Lighting 89.8
Reflection 104
Parallax 106
73% 99.7 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 95.4
Splatting 77.7
80% 100 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid INTEL SSDPEKNW01 1TB
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 256 82 241 92 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 1,250
Write 1,280
Mixed 1,005
SusWrite 193
208% 932 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 28.6
94% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 157
119% 158 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 227%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
672GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 290 264 169 202 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 461
Write 586
Mixed 305
SusWrite 241
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 14.3
49% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 63.9
63% 99.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 320%
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G1G0B- 240GB
108GB free
Firmware: Z331
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 115 130 119 115 113 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.6% Below average
Read 281
Write 380
Mixed 298
SusWrite 129
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 11.1
43% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 46.4
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 26.8
41% 75 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 45%
Amd-raid SSDPR-CL100-480- 480GB
170GB free
Firmware: S042
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 230 12 51 56 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.2% Below average
Read 249
Write 375
Mixed 288
SusWrite 126
59% 259 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 10.7
44% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 44.4
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 20.8
38% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IRP3600D4V64L17/16G Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.3% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 19.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 22.1
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF - $112

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $593
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback