Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 27 '20 at 21:24
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$270
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 156
2-Core 312
99% 184 Pts
4-Core 616
8-Core 997
99% 806 Pts
64-Core 1,545
96% 1,545 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 96%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,956
Write 6,028
Mixed 7,423
1,727% 7,802 MB/s
4K Read 667
4K Write 273
4K Mixed 313
1,556% 418 MB/s
DQ Read 1,931
DQ Write 1,434
DQ Mixed 1,464
1,154% 1,610 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
53GB free
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,182
Write 1,318
Mixed 707
307% 1,402 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 60.1
233% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,084
DQ Write 1,418
DQ Mixed 870
763% 1,124 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
278GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 68 71 70 70 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 63.7
Write 69.4
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 70.3
89% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
31% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27%
Great: 59%
WD Elements 25A1 1.5TB
28GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 9.3 7.5 8.2 5.3 5.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 55.3
Write 68.1
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 6.6
50% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 34.8
90% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 36.2
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $971
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback