Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1620-$49 2,566 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G1620 @ 2.70GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 91.4 1-Core 74.9 2-Core 146 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 149 20% 149 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 750 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	7.78% Terrible	Lighting 9.17 Reflection 10.8 Parallax 7.53 8% 9.17 fps	MRender 11.4 Gravity 9.5 Splatting 10 8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 7.78% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M5 Pro 128GB-$130 4,476 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 294 299 308 310 310 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 368 Write 300 Mixed 224 SusWrite 298 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 28.1 102% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 27.5 DQ Write 80.3 DQ Mixed 32.4 31% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingmax FLFF65F-C8KF9 1x4GB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.8 27% 9.37 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 9.5 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	7x
A3-1GU64B1-12C 04CB 16GBUnknownBench 59%, 12 samples	7x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	6x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384