Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '20 at 19:48
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 77.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 234
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 761
75% 612 Pts
64-Core 927
57% 927 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.3% Average
Lighting 60.7
Reflection 56.8
Parallax 58.8
50% 58.8 fps
MRender 69.4
Gravity 51.1
Splatting 51
46% 57.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 307 306 307 308 307 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 486
Mixed 462
SusWrite 310
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 56.8
188% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 250
216% 320 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 114%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
59GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 227 221 218 217 211 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 487
Mixed 412
SusWrite 240
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 54.5
181% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8266.M8FJ Kingston KHX2666C16/8G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 30.5
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 28.7
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,822 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $323
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback