Turbo-x E220S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTurbo-x E220S  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star H310M_ProVH_Plus
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 24 '24 at 18:15
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 35.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 220
61% 121 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 311
38% 293 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3355 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.4% Above average
Lighting 75
Reflection 111
Parallax 58.3
61% 81.4 fps
MRender 43.4
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 39.3
36% 43.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 147 3.1 32 24 13 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.4% Poor
Read 211
Write 253
Mixed 6
SusWrite 75.6
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 8.2
23% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 90%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
35GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 76 79 70 92 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 55.1
Write 93.4
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 83.1
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8266.M8FJ Kingston KHX2666C16/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 6.8
22% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 0P 3R 5G 12B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 24% 83 159 4 165 23.8" 1280 720 PHLC24C PHL 242E1GZ
Typical E220S Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Turbo-x E220S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback