Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics97% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime17 Days
Run DateSep 02 '20 at 07:17
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$247
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 272
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 818
80% 655 Pts
64-Core 822
51% 822 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 139
Parallax 121
98% 127 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 128
Splatting 111
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,909
Write 1,182
Mixed 512
263% 1,201 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 55.9
222% 87.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,173
DQ Write 998
DQ Mixed 853
703% 1,008 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
11GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 500
Write 446
Mixed 406
100% 451 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 63.3
211% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 360
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
440GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 420 421 468 446 424 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 222
Mixed 279
SusWrite 435
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 54.7
191% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 256
211% 303 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 120%
Great: 126%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$138
129GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1104 1062 1049 915 866 828 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1343
Write 1,167
Mixed 1,085
SusWrite 971
256% 1,141 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 84.3
282% 99.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,572
DQ Write 1,434
DQ Mixed 1,476
1,115% 1,494 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 267%
Great: 372%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 158GB
138GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 137 157 155 142 160 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.9% Good
Read 523
Write 158
Mixed 180
SusWrite 150
55% 253 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 12.9
81% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 148
120% 171 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 91%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
742GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 121 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 118
Write 110
Mixed 97.5
SusWrite 121
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 20.2
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 22.9
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback