Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 4205U 584 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	Memory 38.2 1-Core 26.9 2-Core 65.2 26% 43.4 Pts	4-Core 61.9 8-Core 57.2 8% 59.6 Pts	64-Core 78.5 5% 78.5 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610 3,878 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 3F1A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	2.95% Terrible	Lighting 2.77 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 3.22 2% 3.57 fps	MRender 3.76 Gravity 2.87 Splatting 8 4% 4.88 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.95% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G32TNH-73A0A 256GB 542 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 211GB free (System drive) Firmware: 90000Q00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 130 132 138 123 114 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.7% Below average	Read 165 Write 90.1 Mixed 144 SusWrite 126 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 8.2 41% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 143 107% 144 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 86%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 32GB 4,096 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 5GB free, PID 557d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.7 1.2 6.3 5.5 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	1.66% Terrible	Read 4.7 Write 4.2 Mixed 6.5 SusWrite 4.4 7% 4.95 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 1.66% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB 48,985 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.13 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 6.8 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	526x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	241x
Pentium 5405UIntelBench 50%, 963 samples	138x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	778x
UHD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 3,878 samples	312x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	112x

SSD
MZNLN256HAJQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 1,091 samples	144x
SSDPEKNW512G8L 512GBIntelBench 147%, 8,016 samples	119x
HFS256G39TNH-73A0A 256GBBench 69%, 586 samples	57x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	170x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	146x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 32%, 18,494 samples	136x