Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
MemoryWindows (Unknown Version) has very low RAM requirements but the operating system desperately requires an upgrade for both security and usability reasons.
OS VersionWindows (Unknown Version) is not installed correctly. This system should be upgraded to at least Windows 8.1. (Note: a minimum of of 1GB of RAM is recommended for Windows 7, 8.1 and 10)
Run History
Motherboard
Memory11.4 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows (Unknown Version)
BIOS Date
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 06 '20 at 14:36
Run Duration31 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU-1%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0 GHz, turbo 0 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 382
51% 381 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 100%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QUM4U-8G2400P16 8001 R748G2133U2S 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 20.4
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback