Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus X200CA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Asus X200CA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X200CA
Memory	2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130918
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '17 at 11:04
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 1007U 5,995 User benchmarks, average bench 39% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	43.9% Average	Memory 74.3 1-Core 41.3 2-Core 81.2 43% 65.6 Pts	4-Core 81.7 8-Core 81.7 11% 81.7 Pts	64-Core 80.4 5% 80.4 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 138D) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3308 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	1.56% Terrible	Lighting 1.63 Reflection 1.62 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 0.93 Splatting 3.13 2% 2.39 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.56% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS545032A7E380 320GB 4,858 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 270GB free (System drive) Firmware: GGBZBD90 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 223 223 60129542145 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 4161 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 1716 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 4159 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 231 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 110830 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 214747709474 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	37.1% Below average	Read 65.5 Write 63.7 Mixed 66.6 49% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.18 63% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 44%
Kingston DTR30G2 64GB 753 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 23GB free, PID 16a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	8.96% Terrible	Read 27.5 Write 12.6 Mixed 11.9 19% 17.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.14 4K Write 0.41 4K Mixed 0.65 51% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.96% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EDJ4216EFBG-GNL-F 1x4GB 494 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 10.2 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 9.3 26% 9.13 GB/s	Latency 91.9 44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X200CA Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X200CA

CPU
Celeron 1007UIntelBench 39%, 5,995 samples	62x
Pentium 2117UIntelBench 43%, 5,157 samples	15x

GPU
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	76x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x

SSD
AS340 120GBApacerBench 67%, 5,956 samples	2x
S101 256GBFanxiangBench 63%, 810 samples	2x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	1x

RAM
EDJ4216EFBG-GNL-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 24%, 494 samples	42x
EDJ4216EFBG-GNL-F 1x2GBElpidaBench 22%, 279 samples	17x
HMT451S6MFR6C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 99 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $296	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350