Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '20 at 19:22
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$100
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 161
69% 113 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 219
30% 221 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6200
Asus(1043 81EC) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 91 120 124 127 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 119
Write 118
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 116
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
337GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 121 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 119
Write 114
Mixed 67
SusWrite 120
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-015.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,733 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $522
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback