Asus P5K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5K  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '20 at 11:44
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$44
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 28.8
2-Core 55.1
37% 52 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 114
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6200
Device(0000 0000) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.04% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 0.12
Parallax 0.06
0% 0.08 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.04%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$23
892GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GA6A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 44 57 46 57 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 41.5
Write 61.2
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 50.9
36% 49.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 5.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 96.5
41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K - $399

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $619
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback