Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics9.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130902
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 09 '20 at 10:39
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$100
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 427
57% 426 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
XFX(1682 3245) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
9.38% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 13.7
8% 13.1 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 17.5
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.38%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX SSD 1TB
709GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 346 334 322 320 305 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.9% Very good
Read 359
Write 320
Mixed 297
SusWrite 324
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 43.7
129% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 40.6
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 59.4
51% 73.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 79%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
650GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 121 121 124 122 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 128
Write 74.5
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 122
72% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 16.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback