| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20141024 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 03 '17 at 14:09 |
| Run Duration | 167 Seconds |
| Run User | BGR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.4%
Average
|
43% 65.8 Pts
|
20% 165 Pts
|
11% 182 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Palit(1569 1184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 372.90
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34.2%
Below average
|
34% 42.9 fps
|
35% 44 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
95.3%
Outstanding
|
125% 166 MB/s
|
79% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
70.3%
Very good
|
84% 113 MB/s
|
75% 0.81 MB/s
| |
|
|
35.1%
Below average
|
45% 59.6 MB/s
|
54% 0.54 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-036.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
31.6%
Below average
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
18% 6.43 GB/s
|
43% 94 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 798 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 197x |
| FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 193x |
| FX-8320AMD $95Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 104x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 65x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 53x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $192 |