Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131114
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 17 '20 at 19:07
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$92
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 169
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 228
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.65% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.56 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.65%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 61 67 98 99 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 84.5
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 87%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$99
41GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0.6 7.7 10 7.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905402-413.A00LF 9905403-173.A00LF 9905403-173.A00LF 9905403-173.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
49.9% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H77M-D3H Builds (Compare 1,299 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H - $97

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $479
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback