bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System
Motherboard	EPoX Intel I945 DDR2 : 5G945M
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20060906
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '20 at 07:11
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 2.80GHz 3,782 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Memory 42.3 1-Core 16 2-Core 31.5 21% 29.9 Pts	4-Core 33.8 8-Core 32.1 4% 32.9 Pts	64-Core 33.6 2% 33.6 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8418) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 325 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.92% Terrible	Lighting 3.77 Reflection 4.15 Parallax 3.34 3% 3.75 fps	MRender 3.24 Gravity 4.13 Splatting 2.57 3% 3.31 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.92% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 175 205 207 219 222 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.4% Average	Read 227 Write 206 Mixed 205 SusWrite 199 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 25.2 4K Mixed 21.2 71% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 37.6 DQ Write 56.6 DQ Mixed 39.2 32% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 128%
Seagate ST3200820AS 200GB 1,565 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 35GB free Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 70 71 72 72 72 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 72 Write 68.1 Mixed 40.4 SusWrite 70.3 46% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 41%
Seagate ST3160815A 160GB-$48 702 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 72GB free Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.39% Terrible	Read 14.1 Write 9.7 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 14.8 9% 12.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.8 127% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.39% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.23 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 1.7 6% 2.13 GB/s	Latency 192 21% 192 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,023x
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,568x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	932x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,141x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	456x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16