Asus H97M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	80.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H97M-E (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150515
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '20 at 14:22
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$52 73,695 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Memory 94.6 1-Core 113 2-Core 218 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 422 59% 435 Pts	64-Core 444 28% 444 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Gigabyte(1458 3FC3) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Lighting 101 Reflection 95.7 Parallax 87.7 83% 94.9 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 90.5 Splatting 81.9 75% 93.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB 36,473 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 115GB free Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 662 629 598 600 595 599 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	158% Outstanding	Read 655 Write 698 Mixed 666 SusWrite 614 149% 658 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 57 194% 69.8 MB/s	DQ Read 778 DQ Write 756 DQ Mixed 1,205 784% 913 MB/s
Poor: 125% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 262%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 194 199 199 188 195 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 475 Mixed 388 SusWrite 209 88% 394 MB/s	4K Read 42.7 4K Write 96.6 4K Mixed 51.6 182% 63.6 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 96.4 DQ Mixed 137 110% 159 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 68GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 100 115 147 149 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 131 Write 134 Mixed 93.2 SusWrite 118 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 109%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 154GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 112 115 116 116 116 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 131 Write 131 Mixed 88.2 SusWrite 115 86% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 43GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 98 102 131 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 136 Write 122 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 109 72% 98.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 107%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 15,750 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 11GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3 2.8 3 3.5 3.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.49% Terrible	Read 21.8 Write 11.2 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 3.2 10% 9.68 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.49% Great: 6%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 514 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 47GB free, PID a102 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 73 73 72 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 66.6 Write 77.6 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 73 84% 62 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	63.4% Good	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 20 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 20.2 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 58.1 69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	585x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	388x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	305x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	199x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	192x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	159x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	70x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	68x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	64x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	107x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	63x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $277

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16