Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	99.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200429
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '20 at 16:21
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Memory 72.1 1-Core 156 2-Core 307 94% 178 Pts	4-Core 594 8-Core 1,042 99% 818 Pts	64-Core 1,488 92% 1,488 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85E9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	99.8% Outstanding	Lighting 127 Reflection 140 Parallax 132 103% 133 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 126 Splatting 106 93% 115 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 500 Write 487 Mixed 349 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 53.2 192% 68.1 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 364 DQ Mixed 178 187% 308 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Sandisk S-1T00 1TB 8,421 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 136GB free Firmware: 411040RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 341 319 212 265 217 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 465 Mixed 332 SusWrite 279 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 39.1 164% 61.7 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 145 163% 278 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 120%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 146 146 147 132 78 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Read 100 Write 96.7 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 132 73% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 54,651 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.9% Very good	MC Read 29 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 28.6 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 22.7 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 29.3 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 96.6 41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	2,632x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $159Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,231x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	859x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	826x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	704x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	625x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	311x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	306x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	376x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	223x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	205x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $738

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16