PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3396 |
Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180510 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 27 '20 at 19:16 |
Run Duration | 169 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
70.5%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84F0) 2GB
CLim: 1381 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4304RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 112 51 49 58 55 MB/s
|
35.3%
Below average
|
|||
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
226GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.4 13 47 MB/s
|
0.71%
Terrible
|
|||
120gb SATA Flash Drive 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: SFPA001N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 8 7 7.2 22 132 MB/s
|
10.5%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$40
373GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 106 108 96 92 20 MB/s
|
25.4%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 04CB M378B5273DH0-CH9 04CB AD63I1C1624EV 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
46.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1,041x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 965x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 400x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 380x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 336x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 209x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |