HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 19:16
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 185
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 334
47% 347 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84F0) 2GB
CLim: 1381 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 17
16% 17.5 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 17.2
16% 20 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4304RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 112 51 49 58 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 347
Write 307
Mixed 222
SusWrite 86.1
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 17.3
4K Mixed 14.6
49% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 18.2
DQ Write 20.8
DQ Mixed 18.3
14% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 56%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
226GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.4 13 47 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
0.71% Terrible
Read 1.2
Write 1.2
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 10.8
1% 3.68 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 0.71%
Great: 92%
120gb SATA Flash Drive 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: SFPA001N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 8 7 7.2 22 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 6.2
Write 5.5
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 30.5
9% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 57%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$40
373GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 106 108 96 92 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 8.9
Write 19.6
Mixed 12
SusWrite 79.7
22% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 04CB M378B5273DH0-CH9 04CB AD63I1C1624EV 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.1% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback