Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 8% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	11.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z670 21 User benchmarks, average bench 24% CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Memory 27.9 1-Core 6.4 2-Core 10.6 12% 15 Pts	4-Core 9.7 8-Core 9.3 1% 9.5 Pts	64-Core 9.9 1% 9.9 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 600 16 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Intel(8086 4102) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.6.3062 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.2% Terrible	Lighting 0.37 Reflection 0.19 Parallax 0.12 0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.2% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk P4 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: SSD 8.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 64 64 64 63 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11.6% Very poor	Read 111 Write 51.4 Mixed 14.1 SusWrite 60.1 13% 59.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 1.2 13% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HYNIX : 1x2GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB Chip DDR2 800 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	5.83% Terrible	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 1.5 MC Mixed 1.3 5% 1.77 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 1.4 4% 1.53 GB/s	Latency 267 15% 267 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.83% Great: 6%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM