Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z670 21 User benchmarks, average bench 24% CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	48.1% Average	Memory 95.5 1-Core 5.9 2-Core 10.4 34% 37.3 Pts	4-Core 10.6 8-Core 10.4 1% 10.5 Pts	64-Core 10.3 1% 10.3 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 600 16 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 1782) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.6.3077 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.2% Terrible	Lighting 0.37 Reflection 0.19 Parallax 0.19 0% 0.25 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.2% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPA064HMDR-000H1 64GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM18H1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 199 199 13182 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 8192 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 460 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1695 (AA) Unknown 72 72 726 (AB) Unknown 99 99 4 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 22 (AE) Unknown 99 99 585 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 103 (BC) Unknown 99 99 14 (BE) vendor-specific 48 44 52 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 99 99 4 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 199 1	24.3% Poor	Read 159 Write 110 Mixed 130 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 9.01 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 6.88 31% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 45.2 DQ Write 34.5 DQ Mixed 10.4 16% 30 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron Not Available 1x2GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB Chip DDR2 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 2 MC Mixed 1.7 6% 2.07 GB/s	SC Read 0.8 SC Write 1.4 SC Mixed 0.7 3% 0.97 GB/s	Latency 55.6 72% 55.6 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 11%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM