Today's hottest deals

Asrock H81M-VG4 R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-VG4 R3.0  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '20 at 19:30
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 202
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 405
55% 408 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 5.08
Parallax 3.38
4% 4.23 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 4.23
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 128 117 109 113 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 483
Write 400
Mixed 314
SusWrite 130
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 11.6
77% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 77.6
DQ Mixed 18.6
36% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
220GB free
Firmware: 1H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 83 79 82 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 87.3
Write 86.5
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 81.3
58% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 0467 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.1% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-VG4 R3.0 Builds (Compare 411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback