Today's hottest deals

Biostar A68N-5600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A68N-5600  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170623
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 12 '20 at 16:24
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4655M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 78.6
44% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 122
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7620G
Biostar(1565 1708) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
4.06% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 4.5
4% 5 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 6.04
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.06%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3600RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 79 57 39 76 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.7% Poor
Read 257
Write 107
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 64.9
28% 129 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 11.7
44% 11 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$150
291GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 82 82 84 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 101
Write 76.8
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 82.1
58% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 70%
SSK 128GB
58GB free
Firmware: 0206
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 38 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F3-10666CL7-2GBRH 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.2% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68N-5600 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A68N-5600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback