Today's hottest deals

Biostar A68N-5545

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar A68N-5545  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '21 at 23:29
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5545M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 26.1
2-Core 43.1
32% 44.1 Pts
4-Core 57
8-Core 70.3
8% 63.7 Pts
64-Core 40.9
2% 40.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 17.7
14% 17.7 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 19
Splatting 16.9
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX2 40GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.37
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.7
Write 47
Mixed 60.4
15% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 8.6
35% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 74.2
DQ Write 43.8
DQ Mixed 49
39% 55.7 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 41%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
453GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 102 105 100 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 96.3
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 102
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F3-10666CL7-2GBRH 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.2% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 1.6
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 30 36.1" 1280 701 TCL0000 55S403
Typical A68N-5545 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A68N-5545

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback