Supermicro C7Q67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro C7Q67  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C7Q67
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '20 at 00:22
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 186
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 346
47% 352 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Zotac(19DA 9454) 2GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.1% Poor
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 36.5
29% 33 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 34.2
Splatting 0.04
17% 24.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 19 16 9.8 17 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 286
Write 87.1
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 38
27% 124 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 9.5
39% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 15.4
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 50.4
28% 27.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
297GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 97 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 114
Write 109
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 97.3
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G 9905471-011.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C7Q67 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro C7Q67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback