Asrock N68C-S UCC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100423
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateOct 16 '20 at 14:04
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 245
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Memory 53.9
1-Core 33.5
2-Core 70.3
34% 52.6 Pts
4-Core 74.7
8-Core 76.5
10% 75.6 Pts
64-Core 78.9
5% 78.9 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Asus(1043 02A8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 1.47
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 1.31
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 1.38
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 58 63 73 64 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 65.1
Write 71.4
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 59.6
43% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 53%
KINGSTON SV300S37A120G 120GB
110GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 20 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 20.9
Write 20.1
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 19.9
28% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 3.8
269% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback