Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive337% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory58 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '20 at 19:24
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User PYF-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$499
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 158
2-Core 317
100% 187 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 1,137
106% 882 Pts
64-Core 2,083
129% 2,083 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 157
Reflection 151
Parallax 152
128% 153 fps
Gravity 133
Splatting 108
105% 120 fps
Poor: 105% Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
610GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2298 1985 1456 1530 1537 1535 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
337% Outstanding
Read 2,465
Write 2,354
Mixed 1,838
SusWrite 1,724
471% 2,096 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 83
277% 97.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,219
DQ Write 914
DQ Mixed 1,088
808% 1,073 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 337%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
706GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1297 1332 1332 1331 1314 1243 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 1,339
Write 1,076
Mixed 1,136
SusWrite 1,308
273% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 61.8
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 83.4
274% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1281
DQ Write 1,075
DQ Mixed 1,171
879% 1,176 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 271%
Great: 410%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 16TB
15TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 368 368 366 368 372 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 355
Write 308
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 368
204% 281 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 2.1
527% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 208%
Great: 208%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$85
681GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 90 90 89 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 130
Write 121
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 88.6
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.1% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 21.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 22.4
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING - $440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,636
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback