Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 960GM/U3S3 FX  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '20 at 18:18
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 64.4
2-Core 124
56% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 235
28% 218 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
XFX(1682 7240) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.8.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.84% Terrible
Lighting 7.13
Reflection 8.12
Parallax 8.72
6% 7.99 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 6.57
Splatting 7.83
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.84%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 169 164 166 168 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 341
Write 297
Mixed 281
SusWrite 166
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 42.1
134% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 217
155% 200 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS728080PLAT20 82GB-$65
37GB free
Firmware: PF2OA21B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 38 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 44.5
Write 42.3
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 37.1
29% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 31%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
854GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 156 156 153 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 183
Mixed 38
SusWrite 154
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 107%
Samsung SV1203N 120GB
92GB free
Firmware: SC100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 44
Mixed 30
SusWrite 37.1
28% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 CT51264BA160BJ.C8 8GB
333, 333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.3% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 14.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 10.4
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 960GM/U3S3 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback