Asus Z170-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics67.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170-E  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '20 at 21:07
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 84.8
1-Core 135
2-Core 268
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 494
62% 473 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.8% Good
Lighting 87.4
Reflection 60.6
Parallax 110
71% 85.9 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 79.7
Splatting 79.5
61% 73.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N181017a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 23 16 37 36 24 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 447
Write 389
Mixed 364
SusWrite 37.3
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 46
178% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 86.2
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 132
116% 168 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
782GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 174 175 173 174 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 168
Mixed 96.8
SusWrite 174
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD BLS4G4D26BFSE.8FB BLS4G4D26BFSE.8FBD2 12GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 14.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 72.1
55% 72.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-E Builds (Compare 1,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $596
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback