Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512DA
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190716
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 01:18
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 174
64% 113 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 32
18% 108 Pts
64-Core 249
15% 249 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Asus(1043 1821) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.41.46.03
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.52% Terrible
Lighting 6.67
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 8.44
5% 9.56 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 5.87
Splatting 13.9
9% 10.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1102 128GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 117 109 111 112 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 483
Write 359
Mixed 321
SusWrite 117
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 36.5
127% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 160
130% 186 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 93%
Spcc Sol id State Disk 512GB
196GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 13 66 319 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
45% Average
Read 359
Write 288
Mixed 281
SusWrite 72.3
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 18.8
70% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 71.3
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 0.6
31% 72.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 12GB
2400, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
61.5% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 20
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 18
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback