Jingsha Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemJingsha Default string  (all builds)
MotherboardJINGSHA Default string
Memory43.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 06:14
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 176
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 673
58% 498 Pts
64-Core 2,657
164% 2,657 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8499) 3GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.1% Average
Lighting 54.9
Reflection 52.2
Parallax 66.6
45% 57.9 fps
MRender 69.5
Gravity 63
Splatting 50.2
49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 73 66 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 459
Write 284
Mixed 318
SusWrite 87
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 27
123% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 181
160% 237 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 85%
Sage 1.14 1TB
953GB free
Firmware: 1.14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 21 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.9% Terrible
Read 0.3
Write 11.7
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 20.7
2% 9.05 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 1.4
8% 4.13 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 7.4
DQ Mixed 1.4
2% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.9%
Great: 4%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
92GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 116 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 143
Write 132
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 115
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
326GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 160 150 159 158 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 153
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 155
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB1-CRC M393A2G40DB1-CRC 9965600-033.A00G 48GB
2400, 2400, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 24.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 17.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Default string Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

System: Jingsha Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback