Asus MAXIMUS IX APEX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX APEX  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '20 at 15:59
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 231
87% 152 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 723
73% 592 Pts
64-Core 699
43% 699 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Sapphire(174B 1071) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.2% Very good
Lighting 97.3
Reflection 102
Parallax 86.7
79% 95.2 fps
MRender 93.1
Gravity 90.9
Splatting 94.5
76% 92.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 128GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM01D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 172 193 250 317 329 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 457
Write 303
Mixed 227
SusWrite 244
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 36.2
140% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 119
133% 230 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
743GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 165 165 166 166 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 152
Mixed 105
SusWrite 165
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 76.C102G.D170B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2460 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 22.3
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 24.6
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX APEX Builds (Compare 492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX APEX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $565
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback