Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime11.7 Days
Run DateOct 30 '20 at 11:59
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 130
60% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 431
41% 337 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.5% Above average
Lighting 71.6
Reflection 73.4
Parallax 66.8
58% 70.6 fps
MRender 69.6
Gravity 65.6
Splatting 68.9
56% 68.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 2 8.3 65 2.3 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 352
Write 273
Mixed 189
SusWrite 38.6
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 17.3
56% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 18.5
DQ Write 25.4
DQ Mixed 20.6
16% 21.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 61%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
392GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 301 83 84 83 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 426
Write 402
Mixed 363
SusWrite 160
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 39.8
131% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 174
132% 175 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 121%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
173GB free
Firmware: 1AA01109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 70 69 70 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 82
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 69.8
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
425GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 166 169 166 168 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 114
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 166
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F Transcend TS1GLK64V6H 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback