Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '20 at 11:50
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 57%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 134
57% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 439
41% 341 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2352 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.7% Above average
Lighting 79.2
Reflection 80.7
Parallax 75
64% 78.3 fps
MRender 77.4
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 0.09
36% 49.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 1.9 2.3 26 2.7 7.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 360
Write 294
Mixed 224
SusWrite 26.1
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 18.1
59% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 18.2
DQ Write 25.5
DQ Mixed 20.1
16% 21.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 61%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
142GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 270 76 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 464
Write 442
Mixed 383
SusWrite 161
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 40.9
139% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 194
147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 121%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
137GB free
Firmware: 1AA01109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 85 84 78 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
42% Average
Read 63
Write 53.5
Mixed 56
SusWrite 82.9
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
425GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 117 116 118 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 112
Write 88.4
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 115
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F Transcend TS1GLK64V6H 12GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.3% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 6.3
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 7.4
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback