Asus GL553VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus GL553VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL553VD
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 31 '20 at 13:07
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 195
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 454
49% 391 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 15E0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7325
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Lighting 6.23
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 6.41
5% 12.5 fps
MRender 8.52
Gravity 5.43
Splatting 12.3
8% 8.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1312 915 560 589 63 454 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1439
Write 1,391
Mixed 1,114
SusWrite 649
257% 1148 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 71
222% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 758
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 343
380% 638 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 202%
Great: 277%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
687GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 125 127 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 128
Write 130
Mixed 29
SusWrite 125
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-025.A00G Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.3% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 18
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL553VD Builds (Compare 3,999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback