Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	23.4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 23.4GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	19.6 GB free of 23.4375 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '20 at 20:18
Run Duration	108 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Common KVM processor 789 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 32 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Memory 31.2 1-Core 47 2-Core 80.2 30% 52.8 Pts	4-Core 185 8-Core 366 32% 276 Pts	64-Core 1,057 65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% MSI(1462 3681) CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.30.02 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.9% Average	Lighting 31.6 Reflection 44.5 Parallax 117 26% 64.5 fps	MRender 80.6 Gravity 96.1 Splatting 116 82% 97.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 85%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 86GB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 266 Write 218 Mixed 15.2 36% 166 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.4 16% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 23GB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 0, 0 MHz 16384, 7616 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 14.5 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 248 16% 248 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 138%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	21x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $88Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $350