Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 01:51
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Common KVM processor
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 68.7
1-Core 146
2-Core 288
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1054
97% 812 Pts
64-Core 1,302
81% 1,302 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Lighting 66.8
Reflection 71.1
Parallax 68.3
54% 68.7 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 63
Splatting 54.4
50% 61.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 129GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 24 22 22 23 23 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 476
Write 417
Mixed 306
SusWrite 54.1
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 38.5
134% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 187
191% 309 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.8% Good
MC Read 28
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 27.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 27.6
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback