Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 31 '20 at 20:54
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 50.6
2-Core 106
44% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 145
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 85BA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.83% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 4.27
Parallax 3
3% 3.58 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 3.83
Splatting 2.91
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.83%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N191129a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 59 60 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.7% Below average
Read 228
Write 55.7
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 59.2
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 16.3
57% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.3
DQ Write 30
DQ Mixed 24.3
19% 26.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ CT51264BA160B 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
27.1% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 10.4
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 9
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2 Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback