TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM System x3200 -[4363PBS]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemIBM System x3200 -[4363PBS]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM M31IX
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070612
Uptime5 Days
Run DateNov 01 '20 at 21:04
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon 3040
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 20.5
2-Core 37
32% 42.5 Pts
4-Core 40.6
8-Core 34.9
5% 37.8 Pts
64-Core 41.5
3% 41.5 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 38%
 Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253LE120G 120GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 79 65 66 65 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.2% Below average
Read 201
Write 161
Mixed 155
SusWrite 71.5
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 20.3
82% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.3
DQ Write 57.4
DQ Mixed 24.6
24% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 39.2%
 Great: 85%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
105GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 93 93 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 82.4
Write 42.5
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 92.3
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 50.2%
 Great: 59%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 500GB
341GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 79
Write 26.7
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 25.5
30% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
75% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑
This bench: 30%
 Great: 85%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 159GB
42GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 28 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 22.6
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 27.7
21% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑
This bench: 19.1%
 Great: 42%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
193GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 80 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 115
Write 117
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 71.9
64% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 53.6%
 Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.9 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 16.3%
 Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback