Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon 3040 79 User benchmarks, average bench 35% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	Memory 40.4 1-Core 20.4 2-Core 36.9 22% 32.6 Pts	4-Core 29.1 8-Core 30 4% 29.5 Pts	64-Core 36.6 2% 36.6 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220 19,671 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Zotac(19DA 1132) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	2.38% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 1.3 2% 2.03 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.38% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721016CLA382 160GB 1,552 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: JPEOA3FF SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 14 17 32 49 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 63.2 Write 65.8 Mixed 38 SusWrite 31.8 37% 49.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.7 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.5 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 201 20% 201 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,060x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	829x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325